Which one should be recognized, actual cost or fair market value?

April 23, 2009 on 6:59 am | By advertising | In marketing |

If I was asked to write an journal entry for 'a second-hand equipment was given to the owner of Smith Corp by a friend costing $50,000 with a fair market value of $25,000 was inverted in her clinic', which one should I use in debiting equipments and crediting capital, the 50,000 or the 25,000? Why? Please help! Thanks! :)

Related posts:

  1. financial market, capital market, foreign exchange market?
  2. help with some advertising ideas?? points guaranteed!!?
  3. what is a fair market value of 69 vw bug?
  4. Search engine marketing?
  5. Futures and Fair Value in the pre-market?

1 Comment

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. Definately the fair market value. Just because something paid so much for it, or it cost a certain amount, it's only worth what someone will pay for it (anything) or what a given item is going for at that time.

    Comment by larz — April 23, 2009 #

Leave a comment

Copyright © Search and Search, Discussion of Advertising and Marketing